Finland implements CARF through DAC8, reporting to the Finnish Tax Administration (Vero). But Finland is one of the jurisdictions that asks for more than the DAC8 baseline: additional domestic gain and loss detail. The baseline alone will not satisfy the Finnish requirement, and Kryptos covers both layers.
DAC8 sets a common floor, but member states can require more, and Finland does: additional domestic gain and loss information beyond what the baseline exchange carries. A build scoped only to the DAC8 minimum meets the EU obligation and misses the Finnish one.
Reporting gains and losses, rather than just proceeds, means computing cost basis correctly per asset in the right currency. That is the same reconciliation Kryptos already runs for the report, so the Finnish extra is a projection of data you have, not a second pipeline.
The whole obligation runs on one data layer: ingest across every chain and venue, self-certification and TIN validation at onboarding, gains computed on the right basis, and the exact file the authority accepts, validated before it leaves the building.
Yes. Finland implements DAC8 but also asks for additional domestic gain and loss data beyond the EU baseline. A report scoped only to the DAC8 minimum does not satisfy the Finnish requirement.
The Finnish Tax Administration (Vero) receives DAC8 crypto-asset reports, which are exchanged with other EU member states and CARF partners.
Book a walkthrough and we'll map your obligations and run the pipeline on your own data.